
U.S. Healthcare: High Prices, Low Value
How would you rate health-care in America?
The Cost of Staying Healthy
Here are real costs from real U.S. hospital bills: $15 for a single Tylenol pill, $10 for the little paper cup that holds the pill, $53 for a pair of latex gloves, and $800 for a sterile water IV bag.
The U.S. spends over 60 percent more on health care per person than any other developed country. Yet, we still have worse outcomes for critical measures like life expectancy, chronic disease, and infant mortality. The average cost of employer-provided health insurance for a family of four is now over $22,000. That’s one-third of an average family's hard-earned income, all for a service that's provided free of charge in numerous other nations.
This puts a huge strain on American families and government budgets alike because the federal government still covers over a third of all U.S. healthcare costs. There’s no easy fix for this cost problem due to numerous causes, including:
- No one knows what anything costs: Three out of four U.S. adults don’t know of a resource to compare costs among providers
- Drug prices are too high: Americans pay 256 percent more for prescription drugs than residents of any developed country
- Administrative overload for doctors: American doctors spend more time filling out paperwork than seeing patients
- Defensive medicine: Several studies suggest that medical malpractice suits and defensive medicine—the practice of doctors ordering unnecessary tests and treatments to protect themselves from litigation—cost in excess of $100 billion each year
Here are several different ways Washington could help reduce the price of health care.
Common Sense Solutions
Changes to How Medicare and Medicaid Pay
Despite some recent reforms, Medicare still mostly pays for the volume of care delivered (the number of tests and services) rather than the value provided (improving patient health). Washington should experiment more with different fee schedules to make Medicare more efficient. One example could be adding bonuses for physicians who can stay within a set budget for a patient's treatment.
Medicaid needs the same kinds of forward-looking reforms. Because states control how Medicaid is run and the federal government pays most of the bills, no one has had both the desire and the ability to keep costs in check. States could do it, but they don’t really care; the federal government might want to do it, but it can’t.
Allow Medicare to Negotiate Medicine Prices
For the first time, the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act will allow negotiation for a small group of medicines beginning in 2026.
The U.S. pharmaceutical industry has spent a lot of money on research and development, with no guarantee they will discover new medicines. Only 12 percent of drugs entering clinical trials make it to market. Yet, seven out of the top ten drug companies allocate more funds to sales and marketing than to research and development. This indicates the possibility of reducing prices without stifling innovation.
Reduce Rebates Paid to PBMs
Pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) often serve as the middlemen between drug companies and insurance companies. PBMs serve a purpose, but these rebates—which encourage manufacturers to raise drug prices—have risen sharply over the past few years. One study shows that manufacturer rebates to PBMs increased from $39.7 billion in 2012 to $89.5 in 2016, the last year for which reliable data was available.
Tighten the Patent System Against Manipulation
Biological drugs, produced from living organisms as opposed to chemical compounds, account for nearly 40 percent of all prescription drug spending in the U.S., despite being used by just 2% of the population. The companies behind these drugs—which are often used to treat serious autoimmune and other disorders—can get up to 20 years of patent protection before facing competition from generic versions called "biosimilars."
Yet, certain makers of biological drugs seem to be manipulating the patent system. They file numerous new patents just before their medicine's exclusive patent rights expire. These patents might cover minor alterations (like adjusting the dosage) that don’t represent any real breakthroughs but deter generic versions (biosimilars) from entering the market.
Stop the Baseless Lawsuits
According to the American Medical Association, over two-thirds of medical malpractice suits are easily dismissed, and doctors win most cases that go to trial—indicating that these suits lack merit. Washington could work on actual changes to the legal system that makes it tougher to bring unnecessary medical lawsuits and limit how much money juries can award.
Ensure Real Price Transparency
In early 2018, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services directed all hospitals to post prices for all their services. Hospitals are now doing it, but the information is often useless.
A January 2019 New York Times story showed procedures from various hospital price lists: $42,569 for a cardiology procedure described as “HC PTC CLOS PAT DUCT ART” from Vanderbilt University Medical Center and $9,818 for “Embolza Protect 5.5” from Baptist Health in Miami.
In other words, complete gibberish to anyone who isn’t a medical professional. Health care is complicated, and hospital prices and services will never be as simple as a McDonald’s menu. But real price transparency requires clear, understandable lists of services and prices that support consumers in finding affordable care.
Which proposed changes do you support? What specific challenges have you encountered within the US healthcare system?
Read Common Sense Majority's official policy on Being Responsible here.
It's ridiculous that we as a nation cannot provide adequate healthcare for our citizens. It's terrible that many people can't switch jobs or start a new business because they have to remain at their current job to maintain health insurance or that people have to beg for money to cover healthcare expenses through vehicles like Go Fund Me.
Potentially unpopular opinioning time.
While I agree the state of healhcare in America has declined and there, unarguably, is some business greed associated with it, that is not the primary issue and expanding government's role in healthcare pricing and provision is 100% NOT the solution.
From my personal life experience, two points in particular are worth challenging:
1) "That’s one-third of an average family's hard-earned income, all for a service that's provided free of charge in numerous other nations." First of all nothing is "free of charge." Everything costs money. The only question is who pays. In this case, "free" means someone else is paying - these days it's another taxpayer. The phrase "the only way someone gets something for nothing is when someone else is getting nothing for something" applies here. Having lived in a European country for a couple of a years, having a child there (as well as in the US, so I can compare), and experiencing "free" healthcare, there is no comparison to the US's (then) private system for quality, availability of care, and cost. Where I lived had high taxes (to fund the "free healthcare") and long wait times to get, relative to the US, fairly poor quality care. That care was also rationed, so people who needed care either could not get it ("you're not sick enough or in enough pain") or they had to go to the, thriving, private market as an alternative. It's always amazing how capitalist models seem to fill in the inevitable gaps left by government-run programs.
2) While I agree there is waste in the big pharma model, there is waste in all large corporate models. I also agree that pharma direct-to-consumer (DTC) marketing is a practice that is both wrong and takes far too much of a pharma company's budget, especially given that the user of the script is not the actual customer, The prescribing doc is. Advertising to someone who has no medical credentials seems pretty wrong to me, even if it is legal. Having said all that, there are many, many smaller pharma companies that are doing much needed research and workign to bring great meds to patients who need them. Our market has shown repeatedly that, with some common sense controls (no, I don't think uncontrolled capitalism is 100% the answer all the time), market forces do a better job of allocating scarce resources in a way that balances access with available capital for what is always a highly speculative investment (+95% of researched therapies never make it to market). Yes, use government to restrict pharma DTC advertising. That'll save a ton of money that can be used for R&D investment, but keep the government out of pricing discussions, but ensure people are aware of what their healthcare actually costs. Again, I point to my time in Europe where care was rationed and part of that rationing was (and still is) access to needed drugs. With the government actively involved in price setting (let's call it what it really is), we'll get not only less access to needed therapies now, but reduced investment in future therapies.
Let's all play the long game and enhance what our culture and economy do well and augment where we struggle.
Our healthcare is OK for most people but not all. The cost is out of control at this point. We need to change healthcare for the better. But need to make sure changes don't make it worse or more expensive like past legislation has done.
Healthcare in America should be a non profit industry. That does not mean a socialist program!
Pay doctors, nurses and staff what they get. Pay all the other bills it takes to run a hospital. All profits should go back to the hospital to increase care and expand treatments. Not go to some shareholder that has nothing to do with day to day operartions.
There are boards of directors in hospitals in America now that do not have a doctor or a nurse on the board. They are pure profit driven making us customers not patients.
Insurance companies and Pharmaceutical companies now control American healthcare. Doctors are simply order takers for some drug or device or surgical procedure. Americans should be, must be, their own advocates and be given the ability to become well informed so as to make the right health care decisions in partnership with their doctors.